RICHMOND -- The envelope, please. The award for the
most prolific bill filer during the General Assembly's 2003 session goes to
Delegate Robert G. Marshall of Loudoun and Prince William counties.
The contest wasn't even close: Marshall, a Republican representing House District 13,
filed 48 bills by Friday's deadline. The runner-up was Sen. William C. Mims, R-Leesburg,
with 35 bills.
The Top 10 bill filers (actually, 12; there were ties for the No. 10 spot) included
Delegate Robert B. Bell, R-Charlottesville; Delegate David B. Albo, R-Springfield; Sen.
Thomas K. Norment, Jr., R-Williamsburg; Delegate R. Steven Landes, R-Weyers Cave; Delegate
L. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Woodbridge; Sen. R. Creigh Deeds, D-Hot Springs; Sen. Kenneth W.
Stolle, R-Virginia Beach; Delegate Jeannemarie Devolites, R-Vienna; Delegate Thelma Drake,
R-Norfolk; and Sen. William C. Wampler Jr., R-Bristol.
Together, those legislators are the "chief patrons," or sponsors, of 369
bills, ranging from repeal of Virginia's estate tax (Norment) to protection for corporate
whistleblowers (Mims).
That's almost 18 percent of the 2,093 bills introduced by the 140 members of the
General Assembly.
Lawmakers can have a lengthy list of reasons for sponsoring a lengthy list of bills.
"Delegate Marshall has a lot of issues he want to address," said his
legislative assistant, Claire Gardner.
Moreover, Marshall often files several similar bills on the same issue. For example, he
is sponsoring five bills about licensing abortion clinics.
"Some of the bills that Delegate Marshall has filed are very similar with minor
changes," Gardner said. "This provides a higher chance that one of the bills
will get through the system without being severely amended."
A legislator's seniority can also affect the number of bills he or she files.
Norment, for instance, is serving his 12th term in office and has a reputation for
getting legislation passed. So other lawmakers often call on him to sponsor bills, his
office says.
Also, some of Norment's proposals represent technical corrections of existing laws --
not new statutes.
Is there a relationship between a legislator's bill output and his or her proficiency
in public office?
"Ultimately, the voters are the judges of each legislator's choices in the bill
lottery," said Larry J. Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University
of Virginia. "Each legislator is elected independently and has to represent
constituents in the manner he or she believes appropriate.
"To some, that means introducing dozens of bills and resolutions. To others, it
means introducing few or none in the interests of reducing costs and the passage of new
laws."
Delegate Daniel W. Marshall, R-Danville, falls in the latter category.
"When I ran for the House, I decided I did not want to throw out a lot of
bills," he said. "To me, it's not about quantity, but it is about quality.
Before filing a bill, I want to make sure it will help our district and state."
Daniel Marshall said he wants the General Assembly to become more effective with its
lawmaking ability. In his opinion, bogging down the system with large numbers of bills
defeats that goal.
"We set ourselves up for failure with the system," he said. "I do not
think we leave enough time to have thoughtful discussion about the bills."
This session, Daniel Marshall is sponsoring just three bills.
Sen. Frank M. Ruff Jr., R-Clarksville, is in the middle of the pack with 14 bills
filed. He is astounded by the amount of legislation introduced for this 46-day session:
It's even higher than the 2,066 bills considered during last year's 60-day session. And
those numbers don't include hundreds of resolutions put in the legislative hopper.
Still, Ruff does not want to limit the number of bills. He said the filings represent
democracy in action.
"The citizens, are fairly represented. You have no other way to seek changes in
state government than by asking your representatives in the House of Delegates and Senate
of Virginia to introduce legislation on your behalf," he said.
"If we are to maintain a vibrant, representative government, we cannot and must
not close opportunities that are there for the people."
Sometimes bills are needed to rein in government, Ruff said. He recently served on a
subcommittee that reviewed various state boards and commissions, to see if they have
outlived their purpose. "From the findings of our subcommittee, I am introducing a
handful of proposed bills that if passed will eliminate 11 boards with a total of 99 board
members."