By Fr. Terry W. Specht
Special to the Herald
(From the issue of 8/12/04)
Arlington Bishop Paul S. Loverde’s announcement to require fingerprinting
and criminal history background checks for all diocesan personnel and
volunteers who have substantial contact with children may not have come as
the most welcome of news for those who have to balance budgets, run programs
and recruit volunteers.
The new requirement that will affect an estimated 15,000 individuals
across the diocese involved in 72 parishes and missions and 39 schools, and
will be seen by many as inconvenient and costly, brings with it the risk of
delaying some parish and school operations, projects and ministries. It
compelled many priests and administrators to ask the very real question: Why
would someone who is volunteering his or her time to this community agree to
a compromise of his or her privacy and the time and energy necessary to
complete these checks?
In responding to the recently enacted policy, one priest even described
it as "a violation of one’s civil rights."
While giving these concerns the seriousness they deserve, the Church can
and should still do nothing less.
Often forgotten in debates revolving around rights is the unassailable
truth that with rights come obligations. In the Catholic perspective,
obligation often is the more pressing concern. While one has many rights,
one does not have a "right" to have access to other peoples’ children. The
diocese has an obligation to families to demonstrate that every reasonable
precaution has been taken to provide all children entrusted to the community
of faith with a safe and nurturing environment. One way to meet this
obligation is to ensure that we know the background of those who work with
children.
The fingerprinting and criminal history background checks that thousands
of people of the diocese will have to undergo in the coming months represent
a baseline of protection for the children placed by their parents in the
care of the Church. They are measures that build upon the policies and
procedures that have been developed in the diocese since 1991 for the
prevention and reporting of cases of sexual misconduct and child abuse. They
are also in keeping with promises of the United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops, who in their "Charter for the Protection of Children and
Young People," pledged to evaluate the background of all Church personnel
who have responsibility for the care and supervision of children and young
people. Another diocese that has completed similar background checks found
that five persons who had volunteered to work with children were convicted
child abusers. Our own children deserve nothing less than our taking every
reasonable precaution to ensure their safety.
Here are a few things that the new policy on background checks is not:
It is not a fail-safe solution to the problem of child sexual abuse by
Church personnel. The fact that an individual has never been caught
abusing children, or even that he has never committed this crime in the
past, does not preclude the possibility that he or she may do it at some
point in the future. That is why our diocese is working on a number of
different fronts to ensure that our parishes and schools are safe
environments for our children. Other measures include training for
personnel in identifying and preventing child abuse, and the establishment
of clear guidelines for ethical and moral behavior.
Despite the catchy headlines in secular newspapers, such as "Diocese
to probe priests," this measure is not a rooting out of suspected child
abusers. The fingerprinting and background checks are proactive steps
toward the goal of creating safe havens for children. Our clergy are not
being hunted down; they are stepping up to offer assurances that they,
along with those they employ and appoint to work with children, have never
been guilty of an act that makes them unsuitable to exercise this ministry
and be in the presence of children and young people.
There are many possible reactions to the introduction of this policy but
after reflection, perhaps the best reaction is hope … that the extra steps
and the extra money needed for this more detailed protective process will
deter some who mean harm and protect those who need our care. We should
nourish the hope that this act of humility and sacrifice which Church
workers are called upon to give will deepen their faith in God and
strengthen their sense of service to his children.
Fr. Specht is the Diocesan Director of Child Protection and Safety.