Election Results Spell Pro-Life Victory

By Mary Beth Bonacci
Herald Columnist
(From the issue of 11/14/02)

The big news is that the 2002 elections were a huge Republican victory. But the bigger news, as far as I’m concerned, is that those elections were a huge pro-life victory.

The stakes were high. We have, for the first time in a long time, a committed pro-life president. We have an elderly Supreme Court, with many pro-abortion justices hovering around retirement age. We’ve never had a better opportunity to reverse Roe v. Wade. But there was one ingredient missing: control of the Senate. Powerful pro-abortion senators (including Catholic "friends" like Ted Kennedy) have always been committed to blocking any judicial nominee who respects the right to life for the unborn. As long as the overwhelmingly pro-abortion Democratic Party controlled the Senate, the president didn’t have a prayer of appointing a pro-life justice to the Supreme Court.

But apparently that’s not the case anymore, is it?

It’s funny, because it was the "other side" that made abortion an issue in this campaign. I travel a lot, which means I watch TV in hotels a lot, which means I had the opportunity to see campaign commercials in a lot of different states. And — because the same pro-abortion groups funded them — those ads all looked exactly the same. "Candidate Bad is an extremist who wants to take away a woman’s right to choose. But Candidate Good is a reasonable person who trusts the women of our state to make their own decisions." (Question: Does Candidate Good also trust the women of that state to make their own decisions about how fast they should drive? Maybe, if women are so inherently trustworthy, we should just be exempted from all laws.) When asked if he would challenge those ads, one pro-life candidate said he saw no reason to. He believed that position would gain him votes.

Apparently he was right. The pro-abortion movement dumped huge amounts of money into these elections. It saw staggering losses. Emily’s List, a pro-abortion political group, lost 17 of the races they considered their "top 22," while eight of the top 10 most important Senate races in the country were won by pro-life candidates. Two-thirds of the newly elected House members are pro-life.

Interestingly, the evidence shows that many of these new pro-life Senators and congresspersons were elected because of their pro-life views. Fox News exit polls consistently showed that huge numbers of voters considered abortion a significant factor in their decisions. And those who considered abortion a significant factor voted overwhelmingly pro-life.

Were these people one-issue voters? Many probably were. But, when the issue is something as serious as abortion, how could we be anything else? No issue we face today is more important than the fact that we condone the cold-blooded murder of over 1 million of our own every year. Voting for a candidate who condones because we like some other policy he favors would be like voting for Mussolini because he made the trains run on time.

Most of the victories were Republican, but Nov. 5 turned out to be a pretty good night for pro-life Democrats as well. These people make up a very small percentage of Democratic candidates, and it is widely recognized that a pro-life Democrat has no chance of ascending the ranks in his party. Yet two pro-life Democrats won Tuesday night, with a third candidate going into a December run-off election.

The moral of the story? First of all, the NARAL and their ilk are badly out of step with the sensibilities of the nation. These people are very powerful, very well-funded and very loud. They really did give the impression that a pro-life position would be the kiss of death to any politician. But they were obviously very, very wrong. Thanks to them, no voter was unaware of their candidates’ position on abortion. Yet pro-lifers won overwhelming victories.

Second, we have seen the power we Christians still hold in this country if we choose to exercise it. I saw churches mobilize in ways I’ve never seen before, urging their congregations to vote their Christian consciences. In the Archdiocese of Denver, a letter from the archbishop and auxiliary bishop was read at every Mass the Sunday before the election, urging Catholics to vote pro-life. It made a difference.

Third and finally, we have seen the power of prayer. So much of the information I saw in the weeks before the election included urgent pleas to Christians to pray for the elections. I believe those prayers were heard.

God cares about the future of this country. As Benjamin Franklin once said, "God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?"

We absolutely need to keep invoking His aid — regularly and fervently. God is not Republican. He is not Democrat. But He is definitely pro-life.

Bonacci is a frequent lecturer on chastity.

Copyright ©2002 Arlington Catholic Herald.  All rights reserved.