
Scale Matters
By Mary Beth Bonacci Herald Columnist
(From the issue of 6/23/05)
Guantanamo Bay is the new Gulag.
So says the Secretary General of Amnesty International, a woman named
Irene Khan, comparing the Soviet Union’s labor and extermination camps to
the U.S. prison for Al-Quada detainees. Never mind, of course, that
residents of the Gulag were placed there for "crimes" such as growing too
much grain or refusing to sleep with Soviet officials, while Guantanamo (or
"Gitmo") is populated with militants waging war against America. Never mind
that literally millions were starved to death in the Gulag, while the United
States not only feeds the inhabitants of Gitmo, but provides them with food
that meets the strict requirements of their religion. Never mind that, while
millions died in the Gulag for the simple "crime" of professing their faith,
the United States provides the detainees at Gitmo their own copies of the
Koran, the same "sacred" document that many of them used to justify their
violence against the United States.
And, of course, never mind that literally every story I’ve seen about the
alleged "abuses" at Gitmo, when probed, turns out not to be abuse at all.
(For instance, the "desecration" of the Koran, which turned out to be a case
of a prison guard inadvertently relieving himself too close to an air duct.
The prisoner whose Koran was "desecrated" immediately received a new uniform
and a new copy of the Koran. Try that in the Gulag.)
William Schultz of Amnesty International USA, in backing off the story,
said that the comparison wasn’t intended to be "literal" but that certain
similarities existed.
Yeah, like the fact that both the Gulag and Gitmo were located on planet
Earth.
This is not generally a political column, and I’m not writing one today.
But Schultz’s comment goes to the heart of what I see as a larger problem in
the world — and in the Church. People make comparisons that make no sense,
and then they build entire belief systems around those comparisons.
Let’s take, for instance, the abortion issue. I wrote a series of columns
about that subject last fall, and received an avalanche of mail — much of it
angry. The thing is, not one person attempted to defend abortion. Instead,
they adopted what I call the "Yeah, but ... " position. "Sure abortion is
bad. But what about ... " You can insert any issue into the sentence. The
unemployed, the uninsured, the homeless — anything to steer the topic away
from abortion.
So what about them? And what do they have to do with abortion?
I’m not in favor of homelessness, or joblessness, or any other "-lessness."
Nor do I, contrary to what Howard Dean may say, want children to go to bed
hungry at night. I work to rectify the injustices I see in the world, to the
extent that I am able.
But when it comes to injustice, nothing going on in this country comes
close to the abomination which is abortion.
Radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt summarized the problem in a nutshell
when he said, "scale matters." There is a difference between Gulag and Gitmo.
There is a difference between losing your job and losing your life. There is
even a difference between one person unjustly losing his life and 45 million
people unjustly losing their lives. Both may be bad, but one is a whole lot
worse than the other.
Forty-five million innocent unborn Americans have lost their lives since
1973. And those lives have been lost in particularly brutal ways. They were
torn limb from limb. They were burned. Their skulls were pierced with
scissors and their brains were sucked out. And it all took place in the
clean, sterile environment of our medical centers. It was legally
sanctioned, and happened for no other reason than that those lives were
inconvenient to us.
Who could dare to compare that to a round of layoffs?
As I said, many of the "yeah, but ... " people I hear from are angry. I
suspect that not a few of them are angry because they have personally been
involved with an abortion somehow. They don’t acknowledge the horror of
abortion because they can’t bear to acknowledge the horror of abortion. So
they change the subject — to anything and everything else they can find.
That’s understandable. Not constructive, but understandable. Each of
those 45 million abortions represents a mother who was violated — whose
child died violently inside her own body. It represents a father,
grandparents — an entire extended family who will never see that child in
this life.
We have a whole lot of walking wounded here. And many of them are using
their anger as a shield to protect themselves from facing the unfaceable.
We do ourselves no favor when we refuse to face reality. We don’t give
God the opportunity to forgive and restore us. And we don’t give our nation
the opportunity to face and address our deepest problems.
It’s quite simple: anyone who says that Gitmo is the Gulag of our times
doesn’t understand the Gulag. And anyone who says "Sure, abortion is bad,
but ... " doesn’t really understand abortion. Some things are worse than
others. Scale matters.
Bonacci is a frequent lecturer on chastity.
Copyright ©2005 Arlington Catholic
Herald. All rights reserved. |