The media, egged on by a small group of
dissenting Catholics, have been having a field day with the tragedy now facing the Church.
And, as you might expect, the reporting has been littered with falsehoods and outright
fabrications. Crisis magazine put together a list of the 10 most common false media
claims -- along with its fact-filled responses to them. The column is reprinted with
permission of publisher and editor Deal Hudson.
1. Catholic priests are more likely to be pedophiles than other groups of men.
This is just plain false. There's absolutely no evidence that priests are more likely
to abuse children than are other groups of men. The use and abuse of children as objects
for the sexual gratification of adults is epidemic in all classes, professions, religions,
and ethnic communities across the globe, as figures on child pornography, incest, and
child prostitution make abundantly clear. Pedophilia (the sexual abuse of a prepubescent
child) among priests is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3 percent of the entire
population of clergy. This figure, cited in the book Pedophiles and Priests by
non-Catholic scholar, Philip Jenkins, is from the most comprehensive study to date, which
found that only one out of 2,252 priests considered over a 30-year period was afflicted
with pedophilia. In the recent Boston scandal, only four of the more than 80 priests
labeled by the media as "pedophiles" are actually guilty of molesting young
children.
Pedophilia is a particular type of compulsive sexual disorder in which an adult (man or
woman) abuses prepubescent children. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals
now coming to light do not involve pedophilia.
Rather, they involve ephebophilia -- homosexual attraction to adolescent boys. While
the total number of sexual abusers in the priesthood is much higher than those guilty of
pedophilia, it still amounts to less than 2 percent -- comparable to the rate among
married men (Jenkins, Pedophiles and Priests).
In the wake of the current crisis in the Church, other religious denominations and
non-religious institutions have admitted to having similar problems with both pedophilia
and ephebophilia among the ranks of their clergy. There's no evidence that Catholic
prelates are more likely to be pedophiles than Protestant ministers, Jewish leaders,
physicians, or any other institution in which adults are in a position of authority and
power over children.
2. The celibate state of priests leads to pedophilia.
Celibacy bears no causal relation to any type of deviant sexual addiction including
pedophilia. In fact, married men are just as likely as celibate priests to sexually abuse
children (Jenkins, Priests and Pedophilia). In the
general population, the majority of abusers are regressed heterosexual men who sexually
abuse girls. Women are also found to be among those sexual abusers. While it's difficult
to obtain accurate statistics on childhood sexual abuse, the characteristic patterns of
repeat child sex offenders have been well described. The profiles of child molesters never
include normal adults who become erotically attracted to children as a result of
abstinence (Fred Berlin, "Compulsive Sexual Behaviors" in Addiction and
Compulsion Behaviors [Boston: NCBC, 1998]; Patrick J. Carnes, "Sexual Compulsion:
Challenge for Church Leaders" in Addiction and Compulsion; Dale O'Leary,
"Homosexuality and Abuse").
3. Married clergy would make pedophilia and other forms of sexual misconduct
go away.
Some people -- including a few vocal dissenting Catholics are exploiting this
crisis to draw attention to their own agendas. Some are demanding a married Catholic
clergy in response to the scandal, as if marriage would make men stop hurting children.
This flies in the face of the aforementioned statistic that married men are just as likely
to abuse children as celibate priests (Jenkins, Pedophilia and Priests).
Since neither being Catholic nor being celibate predisposes a person to develop
pedophilia, a married clergy wouldn't solve the problem ("Doctors call for pedophilia
research," The Hartford Currant, March 23). One has only to look at similar
crises in other denominations and professions to see this.
The plain fact is, healthy heterosexual men have never been known to develop erotic
attractions to children as a result of abstinence.
4. Clerical celibacy was a medieval invention.
Wrong. In the Western Catholic Church, celibacy became universally practiced in the 4th
century, beginning with St. Augustine's adoption of the monastic discipline for all of his
priests. In addition to the many practical reasons for this discipline -- it was supposed
to discourage nepotism -- the celibate lifestyle allowed priests to be more independent
and available. This ideal also called diocesan priests to live out the same witness as
their brothers in monastic life. The Church hasn't changed her directives for celibacy,
because over the centuries she has realized the practical and spiritual value of the
practice (Pope Paul VI, On the Celibacy of the Priesthood;, Encyclical letter, 1967).
Indeed, even in the Eastern Catholic Church -- which includes a married clergy -- the
bishops are chosen only from unmarried priests.
Christ revealed the true value and meaning of celibacy. Catholic priests from St. Paul
to the present have imitated Him in their total gift of self to God and others as
celibates. Although Christ raised marriage to the level of a sacrament that reveals the
love and life of the Trinity, He was also a living witness to the life of the world to
come. The celibate priesthood is for us a living witness to this life in which the unity
and joy of marriage between a man and a woman is surpassed in the perfect, loving
communion with God. Celibacy properly understood and lived frees a person to love and
serve others as Christ did.
Over the past 40 years, celibacy has been an even more powerful witness to the loving
sacrifice of men and women who offer themselves in service their communities.
5. Female clergy would help solve the problem.
There's simply no logical connection between the deviant behavior of a tiny minority of
male clergy and the inclusion of women in their ranks. While it's true that most
statistics on child molestation show that men are more likely to abuse children, the fact
is that some women are also child molesters. In 1994, the National Opinion Research Center
showed that the second most common form of child sexual abuse involved women abusing boys.
For every three male abusers, there's one female abuser. Statistics on female sex
offenders are more difficult to obtain because the crime is more hidden (Interview with
Dr. Richard Cross, "A Question of Character,", National Opinion Research Center;
cf. Carnes). Also, their most frequent victims (boys) are less likely to report sexual
abuse, especially when the abuser is a woman (O'Leary, "Child Sexual Abuse").
There are reasons why the Church cannot ordain women (as John Paul II has explained
numerous times). But that is beside the point. The debate about women's ordination is
completely unrelated to the problem of pedophilia and other forms of sexual misconduct.
6. Homosexuality isn't connected to pedophilia.
This is plainly false. Homosexuals are three times as likely to be pedophiles as
heterosexual men. Although exclusive pedophilia (adult attraction to prepubescent
children) is an extreme and rare phenomenon, one third of homosexual men are attracted to
teenage boys (Jenkins, Priests and Pedophilia). The seduction of teenage boys by
homosexual men is a well-documented phenomenon. This form of deviant behavior is the most
common type of clerical abuse and is directly connected to homosexual behavior.
As Michael Rose shows in his upcoming book, Goodbye! Good Men, there's an active
homosexual sub-culture within the Church. This is due to several factors. The Church's
confusion in the wake of the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the tumult following the
Second Vatican Council, and the greater approval of homosexual behavior in the culture at
large created an environment in which active homosexual men were admitted to and tolerated
in the priesthood. The Church also came to rely more on the psychiatric profession for
screening candidates and for treating those priests identified as having problems. In
1973, the American Psychological Association changed its characterization of homosexuality
as an objectively disordered orientation and removed it from the Diagnostic and Statistic
Manual IV (Nicolosi, J., 1991, Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality, 1991; Diamond,
E., et. al., Homosexuality and Hope, unpublished CMA document). The treatment of deviant
sexual behaviors followed suit.
While the Church's approach to those who struggle with homosexual attractions has been
compassionate, she has been consistent in maintaining the view that homosexuality is
objectively disordered and that marriage between a man and woman is the proper context for
sexual activity.
7. The Catholic hierarchy has done nothing to address pedophilia.
While we can all agree that the hierarchy hasn't done enough, this claim is
nevertheless false. When the Church's Code of Canon Law was revised in 1983, an
important passage was added: "The cleric who commits any other offense against the
sixth precept of the Decalogue, if the offense was committed with violence or threats, or
publicly or with a minor who is under 16 years [now extended to 18 years], must be
punished with just punishments, not excluding expulsion from the clerical state" (CIC
1395:2).
But that certainly isn't the only thing the Church has done. The bishops, beginning
with Pope Paul VI in 1967, issued a warning to the Catholic faithful concerning the
negative consequences of the sexual revolution. The pope's encyclical letter, "On the
Celibacy of the Priests," addressed the question of a celibate priesthood in the face
of a culture crying out for greater sexual "freedom." The pope affirmed celibacy
even as he called on bishops to take responsibility for "fellow priests troubled by
difficulties which greatly endanger the divine gift they have." He advised the
bishops to seek appropriate help for these priests, or, in grave cases, to seek a
dispensation for priests who could not be helped. In addition, he urged them to be more
prudent in judging the fitness of candidates for the priesthood.
In 1975, the Church issued another document called "Declaration on Certain
Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics" (written by Joseph Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger)
that explicitly addressed, among other issues, the problem of homosexuality among priests.
Both the 1967 and 1975 documents addressed kinds of sexual deviancy, including pedophilia
and ephebophilia, that are is especially prevalent among homosexuals.
In 1994, the Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse issued guidelines to the nation's then
191 dioceses to help them develop policies to deal with the problem of sexual abuse of
minors. Almost all dioceses responded and developed their own policies (USCCB document:
Guidelines for dealing with Child Sexual Abuse, 1993-1994). By this time, pedophilia was
recognized as a disorder that could not be cured, and a problem that was becoming more
prevalent due to the increase of pornography. Before 1994, bishops took their cue from
experts in the psychiatric profession who believed pedophilia could be successfully
treated. Priests guilty of sexual abuse were sent to one of several treatment facilities
across the United States. Bishops often relied upon the judgments of experts in
determining whether priests were fit for ministry. This doesn't mitigate the negligence on
the part of some in the hierarchy, but it does offer some insight.
In response to the recent scandals, some dioceses are setting up special commissions on
child abuse, as well as victims' advocacy groups; and they are officially acknowledging
that any legitimate allegation of abuse must be dealt with immediately.
8. The Church's teaching on sexual morality is the real problem, not
pedophilia.
The Church's teaching on sexual morality is rooted in the dignity of the human person
and the goodness of human sexuality. This teaching condemns the sexual abuse of children
in all its forms, just as it condemns other reprehensible sexual crimes such as rape,
incest, child pornography, and child prostitution. In other words, if this teaching were
lived out, there'd be no pedophilia problem at all.
The notion that this teaching somehow leads to pedophilia is based on a
misunderstanding or deliberate misrepresentation of Catholic sexual morality. The Church
recognizes that sexual activity without the love and commitment found uniquely in marriage
undermines the dignity of the human person and is ultimately destructive. As far as
celibacy is concerned, centuries of experience have proven that men and women can abstain
from sexual activity while living fulfilling, healthy, and meaningful lives.
9. Catholic journalists have ignored the pedophile problem.
As any reader of Crisis knows, this claim is patently false. The October 2001
cover story featured "The High Price of Priestly Pederasty," an expose on the
scandal that wouldn't erupt into the mainstream press for another three months. You can
read our full article at: http://www.crisismagazine.com/october2001/index.html.
And we weren't the only ones who have covered the pedophilia/pederasty problem. Charles
Sennot, author of Broken Covenant, Rod Dreher of The National Review, Crisis
co-founder Ralph MacInerny, Maggie Gallagher, Dale O'Leary, the Catholic Medical
Association, Michael Novak, Peggy Noonan, Bill Donohue, Dr. Richard Cross, Philip Lawler,
Alan Keyes, and Msgr. George Kelly have all covered the issue exhaustively.
Just because the mainstream media have chosen to ignore our work doesn't mean the work
hasn't been done.
10. Requiring celibacy limits the number of men as candidates for the
priesthood, resulting in a high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
First of all, there isn't a "high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
"Again, the vast majority of priests are normal, healthy, and faithful. Every day
they prove themselves worthy of the trust and confidence of those entrusted to their care.
Secondly, those who do not feel called to a life of celibacy are ipso facto not
called to be Catholic priests. Indeed, most men are not meant to be celibate. However,
some are -- and of those, some are called by God to the priesthood.
A priestly vocation, like a marriage, requires the mutual and free consent of both
parties. Thus, the Church must discern that a candidate is indeed worthy and fit mentally,
physically, and spiritually to commit to a life of priestly service. A candidate's desire
for the priesthood does not constitute a vocation in and of itself. Spiritual and vocation
directors are now even more attuned to the character flaws that would make an otherwise
qualified man an unfit candidate.