
Teens and Sex: What's Going On?
By Gail Quinn
Special to the Herald
(From the issue of 12/12/02)
The following guest
editorial was written by Gail Quinn, executive director of the Secretariat for Pro-Life
Activities of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Washington, D.C.
Hats off to Newsweek for its Dec 9 cover story, "The New
Virginity....Why More Teens are Choosing Not to Have Sex."
Despite decades of self-styled experts saying that young people are
going to have sex anyway, so they better be given condoms and pills, kids are proving them
wrong. Rejecting the get-down-make-love ethos of their parents generation, Newsweek
authors write, this wave of young adults represents a new counterculture, one clearly at
odds with the mainstream media and their routine use of sex to boost ratings and peddle
product.
Have all unmarried teens stopped having sex? No. But the percentage of
high school teens who remain virgins has risen substantially in the past decade. The Newsweek
authors suggest several reasons for the surprising rise in virginity among teens.
Young people do fear pregnancy and they fear contracting a sexually
transmitted disease. Some teens say that having loving, involved parents helped them
remain chaste. One added that her career choice requires so much time and effort that she
won't allow herself to be sidetracked by sexual relationships and pregnancy. Alice, a
college sophomore, credits the feminist movement: One of the empowering things about the
feminist movement, says Alice, is that we're able to assert ourselves, to say no to sex
and not feel pressured about it.
There's truth in all these explanations, but Newsweek barely
alludes to one main reason: the spread of abstinence education in public schools. For
years, such education was not funded or poorly funded. Today, the Bush Administration has
said it plans to expand funding for such programs to $135 million (up $60 million since
1998).
Still the decades-old debate goes on. Should we instill values in teens
and teach them that abstinence works you can't get pregnant, you won't pick up an STD, and
you won't get hurt emotionally or tell kids that abstinence is best, but since we know
they're going to have sex anyway, hand them condoms and pills?
For years American taxpayers have ponied up millions for Planned
Parenthood to promote birth control, and hand out condoms, pills and other devices to
teens. In fact, Planned Parenthood got $137 million from the federal government last year
alone. It operates clinics near colleges and in minority communities. And when the college
students and minority women get pregnant and need abortions, Planned Parenthood is only
too happy to provide them for a fee.
Something's terribly wrong with this picture.
Before us are two approaches. One that is helping (abstinence only) and
one that's been followed for decades and proven to be a miserable failure. What to do
ought to be a no-brainer.
We ought to fund with our tax dollars programs of abstinence that really
help. And, by all means, let's find better uses for the many millions we throw away each
year by giving it to Planned Parenthood.
Copyright ©2002 Arlington Catholic
Herald. All rights reserved. |