
Hypocrisy on Pedophilia
By Dr. James Hitchcock
Herald Columnist
(From the issue of 5/15/03)
If the Catholic scandals of the past few years have done anything, they have made
people aware of the evils of child molestation, one of the few sexual activities which
"enlightened" opinion still thinks is wrong. Some Catholics charge that the
media campaign is motivated by anti-Catholicism, and I have no doubt that some of it is.
But it is also a legitimate exposure of real abuses.
It is odd that "enlightened" opinion condemns child molestation, since for
many years "progressives" have been repudiating one after another of traditional
sexual "taboos," to the point where almost anything can be rationalized.
There has long been a movement, just barely out of public sight, agitating for sexual
relations between children and adults, a movement institutionalized in the North American
Man-Boy Love Association, the existence of which has been noticed mainly by the people
whom enlightened opinion dismisses as "the religious right." The movement has
stayed out of sight because the media realize how damaging it would be to the cause of
sexual "freedom" if such groups were known to exist.
For groups like NAMBLA the clerical scandals were a severe blow, making it almost
impossible to push their agenda. But, like other people reaching "liberation,"
they have to move boldly to assert their legitimacy. With media cooperation, they are now
doing so.
The Los Angeles Times, one of the countrys leading newspapers, has given
its annual book award to Judith Levine, a psychologist whose work is titled Harmful to
Minors: the Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. The book has additional
enlightened endorsement in that it was published by a respectable university press
(Minnesota).
Not that Levine advocates child molestation heaven forbid. What she advocates is
"consensual" sex between adults and children as young as 12, as well as primary
schools where children can engage in sexual activity with one another. Is there anything
of which she disapproves? Certainly education for chastity. Shielding children from
sexual experience is what really does them harm.
This is, of course, the exact opposite of what enlightened opinion, including the Times,
has been saying about pedophilia over the past several years. "But," the editors
would no doubt protest, "We are talking about consensual sex. Dont you see the
difference?"
Except in, shall we say, esoteric circles, this is an invisible difference. The whole
point of setting a minimum age for sexual activity is the realization that children, and
most minors, are highly vulnerable to pressure, manipulation and seduction which they do
not fully understand.
Even if young people think they are acting consensually, they often suffer severe traumas
from such experiences, traumas which may haunt them for the rest of their lives. All this
has now been defined away by Levine and the Los Angeles Times.
Levine proves her case by citing the "research" of several psychologists who
are open advocates of pedophilia, including the work of a man who published an article in Playboy
called "The Child-Porn Myth" and has himself been arrested on child
pornography charges. Levine also cites a psychologist named John Money, who is now famous
mainly for a bizarre incident in which he attempted to turn a boy into a girl, an effort
which wrecked the boys life.
I happened to have the television on when Levine was receiving her award. She has
enemies, she warned the "Neo-Nazis" are out to get her. As far as I could
see, the audience was heavily composed of grey-haired people, many of them in sweat
clothes, who looked like grandparents ready for a mall walk. They applauded her
enthusiastically.
Misconduct within the Church deserves exposure and censure. But cynicism can scarcely
go farther than the medias condemnation of priests for conduct considered laudable
when engaged in by appropriately "progressive" people.
Dr. Hitchcock is a professor of history at St. Louis University.
Copyright ©2003 Arlington Catholic
Herald. All rights reserved. |