
The Continuing Mystery of the Shroud (Part 3)
By Fr. William P. Saunders
Herald Columnist
(From the issue of 3/11/04)
Following is the third part of a four-part series concerning the
Shroud of Turin.
Last week we began our review of the scientific evidence concerning the
Shroud of Turin, examining the cloth itself, which clearly originated in
Palestine, and the blood stains, which point to a scourged and crucified
man. We will now continue with reviewing the photographic studies and the
uniqueness of the image.
No pigments, paints, dyes or stains have been found in the fibrils. X-ray
fluorescence and microchemistry on the fibrils eliminate the possibility of
paint being used as a method of creating the image, and ultraviolet and
infrared evaluation have confirmed these studies. If paint had been used, it
would have penetrated through the top fibers onto the lower fibers in the
herringbone weave; however, the image is only on the top fibers with the
lower fibers being untouched. (Note however that the blood did soak through
the fibers.) Also, the image was resistant to bleaching and other standard
chemical agents that would have reacted with paint or some other medium.
Enhanced photography has also produced exciting evidence. The studies
have included photographic enlargements and computer analysis of shapes,
colors, and shadows. Also, a microdensitometer was used which measures very
faint changes in lightness and darkness. In 1979, Jesuit Father Francis L.
Filas of the Loyola University of Chicago, using the STURP research,
observed on the right eyelid of the man four letters "UCAI" which formed a
crown around the crook of an augur’s staff; this image corresponds to the
symbol on a small coin known as the dilepton lituus struck in 29 AD
during the procuratorship of Pontius Pilate (26-36). The coin covering the
left eye was later identified by Professors Bollone and Balossino as the
lepton simpulum, which also was struck in 29 AD. The ancient Jews used
coins to hold down the eyelids. Also, Father Filas noted that later
Byzantine coinage was engraved with an image of Christ Pantocrator which
bore a striking resemblance to the facial image of the shroud, which would
attest to the shroud’s presence in Constantinople.
In 1978, Piero Ugolotti reported that he had detected barely visible
traces of letters and words in Greek, Latin and Hebrew near the face on the
shroud, which were corroborated by philologist Aldo Marastoni of the
Catholic University of Milan. In 1995, scientists with the Paris Institut
d’Optique also reported finding letters and words on the sides of the facial
image on the shroud. An example would be In Necem, an abbreviation of
the Latin death phrase, In Necem Ibis ("You will go to death"),
Nazarennus ("Nazarene") and Pezo which means "to accomplish" in
archaic Greek but in the sense of "celebrating a sacrifice."
The image also has unique, three-dimensional information encoded in it.
Using a VP-8 Image Analyzer (which NASA has used to produce pictures of
planets from light signals picked-up electronically and transmitted to
earth), Dr. John Jackson of the STURP team produced a 3-dimensional picture
from the shroud. Note that a regular two-dimensional image, such as that of
a painting or a photograph, will only produce a badly contorted image in the
VP-8 screen. Only when actual depth or remoteness is shown by less light
does the VP-8 produce a 3-dimensional picture. This evidence again confirms
that the shroud is not like a painting.
The photographs of the shroud also seem to be like X-rays with the images
of bones visible. Dr. Michael Blunt, Challis Professor of Anatomy at the
University of Sydney, noted that in the hands one can see metacarpal bones
and three phalange bones of each finger. Professor Alan Whanger of Duke
University noted that the skull is visible.
Dr. Gilbert Lavoie in his Unlocking the Secrets of the Shroud
presented another intriguing discovery. The negative image of the shroud as
compared with the negative images of photography reveals that the man in
question had either white or light blond hair. He noted another peculiarity:
the shadows of the face and the fall of the hair indicate that the man was
upright and suspended when the image was made, while the blood marks
indicate the man was in the supine position on top of the cloth with the
rest folded over him. Dr. Lavoie concluded that this upright image was made
after the blood had stained the cloth: "This finding is intellectually
exciting to anyone who contemplates the possibility that this image reflects
the moment of the resurrection" (p. 182).
The STURP team provided the following summary of its findings, worth
noting after a review of all of this evidence: "We can conclude for now that
the shroud image is that of a real human form of a scourged, crucified man.
It is not the product of an artist. The blood stains are composed of
hemoglobin and also give a positive test for serum albumin. The image is an
ongoing mystery and until further chemical studies are made, perhaps by this
group of scientists, or perhaps by some scientist in the future, the problem
remains unsolved."
Although the STURP team did not declare the shroud to be the actual
burial cloth of Christ, the evidence presented at least supports a person’s
private belief that it is.
Given this scientific evidence, next week we will examine some of the
more controversial points surrounding the shroud.
Fr. Saunders is pastor of Our Lady of Hope Parish in Potomac Falls and a
professor of catechetics and theology at Notre Dame Graduate School in
Alexandria.
Please note: 100 articles of this column have been compiled in a book,
Straight Answers, and another 100 articles in Straight Answers II. These
books are available through the Notre Dame Graduate School (703/658-4304) or
may be purchased through the Daughters of St. Paul, the Catholic Shop, the
Paschal Lamb and other religious book stores. All proceeds benefit the
building fund of Our Lady of Hope Church.
Copyright ©2004 Arlington Catholic
Herald. All rights reserved. |