
The Future of Catholic Higher Education
By Russell Shaw
Herald Columnist
(From the issue of 9/19/02)
Three months ago a significant deadline came and went for the 235 American Catholic
colleges and universities, and hardly anybody noticed. What was billed as a dramatic
showdown pitting educators against bishops over the future of Catholic higher education
turned out to be a total non-event.
"I think the patient is now dead," says Gerard V. Bradley, a law professor at
Notre Dame, who is immediate past president of an organization of orthodox Catholic
academics called the Fellowship of Catholic Scholars. By "patient" he means
Catholic higher education in the United States.
June 1 was the deadline set by the bishops two years ago for theology professors at
Catholic schools to obtain the "mandatum"a certification that they teach
in communion with the Church.
The mandatum in turn was an elementby far the most controversial one in Ex
Corde Ecclesiae (From the Heart of the Church), the document on Catholic higher
education that Pope John Paul II published on the feast of the Assumption in 1990.
Theology professors at some orthodox Catholic schools publicly and proudly sought and
received the mandate. Elsewhere, perhaps, some privately complied. Most, it is safe to
suppose, did not. June 1 came and went. So much for that.
"The interventions of authority are done," Bradley writes in the Fellowship
of Catholic Scholars Quarterly. "Nothing on the horizon suggests that the
colleges left to themselves will get religion. The Catholicity quotient of our
institutions is set for the next generation. What you see is what you are going to
get."
Not everyone will share Bradley's dour assessment of the situation. Mandate or no
mandate, optimists insist, Ex Corde Ecclesiae provided Catholic higher education
with useful guidelines and promoted conversations between bishops and college presidents
that would not otherwise have occurred.
That could be, but Bradley isn't buying it. The sine qua non for Catholic higher
educationthe Indispensable Conviction, he calls itis the truth of the Catholic
faith. And the ugly not-so-secret in many Catholic schools today is that a lot of the
people in charge reject the idea that a Catholic education is "better because the
faith is true."
To be sure, at many of these institutions one finds the trappings of
Catholicismreligious exercises, student retreats, service projects, and the like.
Bradley calls this The Formula.
"The nearly ubiquitous recipe for a Catholic college today," he explains,
"is to surround an education indistinguishable from that at other schools with a
Catholic collegiate atmosphere." Its constituent elements are good things in
themselves. Unfortunately, they do not add up to a Catholic education.
The crucial factor is the faculty, and here the question is, "Is orthodoxy the
norm or the exception?" Some schools don't know the answer while others know but
aren't letting on. In either case, Bradley says, this is hardly information they share
with parents, alumni, and wealthy donors.
So what now? Bradley proposes a 10-year program for re-Catholicizing a college, yet he
believes that, with a few exceptions, most Catholic schools are "lost
beyond
recall." Wealthy, elite institutions will survive, but many others will not. Still
others eventually will face facts, stop calling themselves Catholic, and compete in the
marketplace with their secular counterparts.
Most Catholics accept Catholic higher education as it is because they've been taught
to. Alumni are propagandized to imagine that alma mater is the same wonderful
placeonly more soof their student days. And often these schools really do have
a lot going for them. But are they offering a Catholic education? If Bradley is right,
they're not.
Copyright ©2002 Arlington Catholic
Herald. All rights reserved. |