Lessons from the Kavanaugh hearings

First slide

As I think about the Senate hearings on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, the entire affair takes on the look of a monstrous distorting mirror where Americans could see reflected certain large realities that now darken our national life. Start with politics, surely the most obvious of these.

The political arena always has been a rough-and-tumble place where the spontaneous response to whiners was, “If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.” But the Kavanaugh hearings marked something different and ominous. Here was hateful evidence that American politics has become a take-no-prisoners blood sport. Central to how that happened are the culture war and especially the epic struggle over abortion.

Abortion was at the heart of the Kavanaugh fight, with pro- and anti-abortion groups pulling out all stops. Consider the efforts by NARAL Pro-Choice America. Strenuously opposed to Kavanaugh from the start, NARAL, which claims 2 million members, mounted a major campaign that included a “town hall” teleconference featuring two senators, Kirsten Gillebrand (D-N.Y.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), and participation, according to NARAL, by 11,000 of its people. And NARAL was hardly alone.

Unavoidably, all this placed further strains on another central theme of the hearings: the tenuous state of man-woman relations.

Obviously the downfall of predators such as Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby is something to be applauded, while the #MeToo movement continues to win important victories in the fight to stigmatize and punish men guilty of abusing women. But progress has a price. As men testify, usually to one another, the drive against male abuse and exploitation has fallout that casts a pall over even objectively innocent social interactions.

Things have reached a point where some men say they fear merely to compliment women colleagues on dressing well lest they be accused of harassment. Are women still allowed to compliment men on their neckties? If so, isn’t that reverse discrimination?) While this can involve relatively trivial matters, what’s ultimately at risk — a respectful, friendly relationship between the sexes—isn’t trivial at all.

And this, lastly, sheds some light on the troubled moral climate in which American children have been coming of age for several decades.

Thirty years before Justice Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford were teens, I attended a Washington high school patronized by middle-class families where the climate was buttoned down, modest and even somewhat repressed. By contrast, contemporaries of Kavanaugh and Ford assure me that — leaving them aside — the picture of teen socializing 1980s-style in the Washington suburbs emerging from the hearings was all too accurate in its depiction of heavy drinking and casual sex. “Everybody smoked pot then,” a woman who now is a grandmother assures me.

What happened in the 30 years between my school days and theirs to account for the change? The answer is clear: the cultural revolution happened — a revolution above all about sex.

Have things gotten better since then? I know of no reason to think they have. This year public high schools in Montgomery County, Md., where Kavanaugh and Ford attended private schools in the 1980s, began handing out contraceptives to students to combat, it was said, an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases. Meanwhile, and not coincidentally, social media routinely expose vulnerable adolescents to new forms of seduction and socially induced anxiety reflected in a high rate of teen suicide.

And here, as the reflecting mirror of the Kavanaugh hearings disturbingly reminded us, is the environment in which many American children have had to grow up for decades.

Shaw is a freelance writer from Washington and author of American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America.

© Arlington Catholic Herald 2018